Social Security Administration's top official, Bisignano, has been appointed as the new CEO of the IRS. The move notably does not require confirmation from the Senate, highlighting the scope of presidential appointment powers.

October 6, 2025

Source:
Forbes
Bisignano to Head IRS in Non-Confirmed Role
Social Security's Bisignano has been named to an additional role as CEO of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This significant appointment will not require confirmation from the U.S. Senate.
This move allows the President to fill a key government position swiftly, bypassing what can often be a lengthy and politically contentious legislative process. Direct appointments of this nature are a feature of presidential authority, though they can also attract public scrutiny.
Understanding the Appointment
Appointments within the federal government fall into two primary categories:
Senate-Confirmed: These are typically high-ranking positions like cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, and federal judges.
Non-Senate-Confirmed: These roles are filled directly by the President and often include key White House staff such as the Chief of Staff.
Bisignano's appointment to the IRS falls into the latter category, underscoring the President's power to staff the executive branch.
Keep up with the story. Subscribe to the PR+ free daily newsletter
Source:
UNT Digital Library - University of North Texas
The Presidential Appointment Process
The path to a high-level government position varies significantly depending on whether Senate confirmation is required. The distinction is a core component of the U.S. government's system of checks and balances.
A Tale of Two Processes
According to the Brookings Institution, approximately 1,340 senior positions require Senate confirmation. The Center for Presidential Transition details this rigorous process, which includes extensive background checks, financial disclosures, and public hearings before a final Senate vote.
In contrast, non-confirmed appointments are made at the President’s discretion. This allows for rapid staffing but involves less public vetting. While efficient, this path can sometimes lead to criticism regarding a lack of transparency and oversight.
Read More
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/trump-588356493df78c2ccd2eb0ff.jpg)
Source:
ThoughtCo
Share this news: