Immerse yourself in a world of knowledge and creativity with every page turn.

Immerse yourself in a world of knowledge and creativity with every page turn.

Immerse yourself in a world of knowledge and creativity with every page turn.

Explore Topics

8 Post

8 Post

8 Post

Explore Topics

8 Post

8 Post

8 Post

Explore Topics

8 Post

8 Post

8 Post

/

/

Share this news:

Share this news:

Fired USAID Staff Launch Rescue Project to Save 80 Aid Programs

Fired USAID Staff Launch Rescue Project to Save 80 Aid Programs

A group of former USAID staff, dubbed the 'lifeboat crew,' has secured independent funding to save nearly 80 humanitarian programs after the agency's sudden closure by the Trump administration.

Source:

The Guardian

Fired Staff Rescue Aid Programs After USAID Closure

In the wake of the Trump administration's closure of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a group of fired staffers has launched an independent rescue mission. Calling themselves the “lifeboat crew,” they have successfully secured new funding to save nearly 80 critical aid programs.

Their efforts are projected to impact an estimated 40 million people worldwide.

The initiative, first reported by The Guardian, is a direct response to the abrupt termination of hundreds of humanitarian projects. Led by former USAID economist Rob Rosenbaum, the group has focused on salvaging programs with the highest immediate impact.

Key Areas of Focus:

  • Maternal and child health

  • Nutrition and food security

  • Infectious disease control

  • Emergency and disaster relief

“We called ourselves the lifeboat crew,” one former staffer said, “to save as many babies as we can.”

Keep up with the story. Subscribe to the PR+ free daily newsletter

Source:

The Guardian

The End of an Era for US Foreign Aid

The rescue mission was born from crisis. On July 1, 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the official closure of USAID, the primary U.S. agency for international development for over 60 years. The move followed a rapid dismantling process that began after President Trump returned to office in January 2025.

Responsibility for the remaining foreign assistance, slashed from $120 billion to $69 billion in managed contracts, was transferred to the State Department.

Administrative Chaos

The shutdown was preceded by a near-total freeze on foreign aid starting January 24, 2025. This action placed most of USAID's workforce on administrative leave, ultimately leading to layoffs for over 1,000 employees. According to Axios, the process was accelerated by Elon Musk, who acted as a cost-cutting advisor to the administration and pushed for the dismissal of top agency administrators.

Humanitarian aid waivers were applied inconsistently, creating widespread confusion and leaving dangerous gaps in critical services across the globe.

Source:

Yahoo News UK

Global Impact and International Condemnation

The consequences of the closure were immediate and severe. A report in The Lancet projected that the U.S. aid cuts could lead to over 14 million additional deaths globally, including 4.5 million children.

Major global health initiatives were thrown into jeopardy.

  • PEPFAR: The U.S. global HIV/AIDS program, which supports treatment for 20 million people, faced termination.

  • Clinical Trials: More than 30 U.S.-funded clinical trials for diseases like HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis were abruptly paused, endangering participants.

Widespread Criticism

The administration defended the closure as a necessary step to eliminate waste and ensure aid aligns with U.S. policy. However, the decision drew swift condemnation from a broad coalition of critics.

Former presidents Obama and Bush publicly criticized the action. Congressional Democrats and international partners labeled it inhumane and unconstitutional, noting the lack of authorization from Congress. Several lawsuits have since been filed challenging the legality of the shutdown.

Allied nations expressed alarm at the loss of a key development partner, warning of a significant void in global health and stability efforts.

Global Impact and International Condemnation

The consequences of the closure were immediate and severe. A report in The Lancet projected that the U.S. aid cuts could lead to over 14 million additional deaths globally, including 4.5 million children.

Major global health initiatives were thrown into jeopardy.

  • PEPFAR: The U.S. global HIV/AIDS program, which supports treatment for 20 million people, faced termination.

  • Clinical Trials: More than 30 U.S.-funded clinical trials for diseases like HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis were abruptly paused, endangering participants.

Widespread Criticism

The administration defended the closure as a necessary step to eliminate waste and ensure aid aligns with U.S. policy. However, the decision drew swift condemnation from a broad coalition of critics.

Former presidents Obama and Bush publicly criticized the action. Congressional Democrats and international partners labeled it inhumane and unconstitutional, noting the lack of authorization from Congress. Several lawsuits have since been filed challenging the legality of the shutdown.

Allied nations expressed alarm at the loss of a key development partner, warning of a significant void in global health and stability efforts.

How did the Trump administration justify the closure of USAID?

The Trump administration justified the closure by claiming USAID was fiscally irresponsible and had strayed from its mission. Officials stated they wanted to ensure foreign aid aligned more directly with US policy under the State Department for 'greater accountability.'

How did the Trump administration justify the closure of USAID?

The Trump administration justified the closure by claiming USAID was fiscally irresponsible and had strayed from its mission. Officials stated they wanted to ensure foreign aid aligned more directly with US policy under the State Department for 'greater accountability.'

How did the Trump administration justify the closure of USAID?

The Trump administration justified the closure by claiming USAID was fiscally irresponsible and had strayed from its mission. Officials stated they wanted to ensure foreign aid aligned more directly with US policy under the State Department for 'greater accountability.'

What are the main criticisms of the Trump administration's decision to close USAID?

What are the main criticisms of the Trump administration's decision to close USAID?

What are the main criticisms of the Trump administration's decision to close USAID?

How has the closure of USAID impacted global health initiatives?

How has the closure of USAID impacted global health initiatives?

How has the closure of USAID impacted global health initiatives?

How did the "lifeboat crew" manage to secure new funding for the programmes?

How did the "lifeboat crew" manage to secure new funding for the programmes?

How did the "lifeboat crew" manage to secure new funding for the programmes?

What specific programmes were saved by the "lifeboat crew"?

What specific programmes were saved by the "lifeboat crew"?

What specific programmes were saved by the "lifeboat crew"?

Share this news: